Choosing a lens household or kind to make use of on a challenge is a really private alternative. Everybody has quite a lot of opinions and favorites and whereas a ton of this determination is solely choice for one look or one other, there’s one determination that performs an enormous half—spherical vs anamorphic. Making the selection to go together with anamorphic glass is an even bigger determination that may affect almost each facet of the workflow.
Somebody who has delved into anamorphic, filmmaker Brady Bessette, breaks down the important thing factors it is best to learn about anamorphic glass and who may need to take into account it over basic spherical lenses.
This can be a little little bit of a studying expertise for Brady as properly, however that does give us a pleasant early lesson on anamorphic lenses. On this case he’s utilizing the comparatively price range Vazen 40mm T2 1.8x Anamorphic Lens. It’s designed for both Micro 4 Thirds system or choose RF-mount cameras, such because the Canon C70 and RED KOMODO.
As for what it is advisable to know to start out is the truth that they squeeze the picture. This results in the opposite time period of stretching. What this does is take a widescreen picture and basically squeeze it to suit on a much less extensive picture sensor space. The picture seems to be squeezed on a contemporary Tremendous 35mm or 4:3 sensor. You’re taking that picture and “de-squeeze” it based mostly on the squeeze ratio to get a “regular” picture with an ultra-wide facet ratio.
A important benefit of this configuration is that you just benefit from your picture space and backbone as a substitute of counting on cropping in publish. An enormous query is solely whether or not you need the widescreen look or want extra typical facet ratios.
A superb instance is should you plan on additionally utilizing this footage for a number of codecs, reminiscent of social media, the place having extra vertical house will assist.
The precise optical design has a big effect on the picture’s look. As a result of it stretches the picture and makes use of quite a lot of uniquely formed parts you get a naturally comfortable picture. Bokeh additionally turns into rectangular and flares can grow to be aggressive as they have a tendency to streak with level sources.
It’s a very distinct look. If you’re on the lookout for a cleaner or sharper picture then spherical optics are superior. Flares are a bit completely different two as it’s usually a round flare with direct sources.
Anamorphic just isn’t all the time the reply. Typically the clear, crisp element of spherical is a more sensible choice than a extremely stylized anamorphic optic.
Do you will have a choice?
[source: Brady Bessette]