As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases from

Photograph company refuses to return copyright to photographer, claims journalists do not have copyright safety: Digital Images Assessment


Do photographers personal the rights to their photos? That is the query on the middle of a authorized battle between photographer Francisco Leong and his former employer, Agence France-Press (AFP).

Leong, a Lisbon, Portugal-based photojournalist, had labored underneath contract for AFP. He first joined AFP in 2005 as a stringer and have become a employees photographer in 2010 earlier than leaving the company in 2019. The company in France claims that it owns Leong’s photos.

Nevertheless, Portugal’s Journalist Statute and Code of Copyright seem to present final rights to journalistic work created throughout employment to the unique creator. Leong instructed Press Gazette that ‘It’s a rule that stands above any particular person contract and states that the copyright belongs to a journalist, interval… on my contract with AFP there was a clause saying the copyright was for AFP. I consider this violates the legislation and due to this fact is null and void.’

The AFP’s protection goes past the contract Leong signed. In line with Leong’s union, Sindicato dos Journalistas (SJ) in Portugal, AFP can be arguing that it distributes information throughout the public area and that what it publishes does not deserve safety underneath copyright legislation, because it constitutes ‘mere automobiles that broadcast to the general public the set of info that painting a selected each day occasion or information.’ SJ argues that AFP’s protection might be a ‘scorched-earth coverage’ and that it threatens the livelihoods of reports photographers and company journalists if AFP wins in a European Union (EU) court docket.

{A photograph} exhibiting AFP’s headquarters in Paris, used underneath CC BY-SA 4.0

AFP goes even additional, arguing that ‘mere information or images that merely report information occasions are usually not inventive, don’t possess originality, and, as such, don’t deserve authorized safety.’ SJ believes this argument may pose a real risk to information businesses in Europe, together with AFP, to cost shoppers for photojournalism and journalism at massive.

The SJ stated, ‘…if the court docket guidelines in favor of AFP on this level, the enterprise mannequin of all information businesses might be put in danger, and thus the roles of hundreds of journalists. That’s as a result of if journalists lose safety over their work as it isn’t eligible for cover, logically their employers can’t declare safety over it both.’

Curiously, regardless of its public area argument, an AFP spokesperson instructed Press Gazette that ‘Francisco Leong’s images are usually not within the public area as a result of the rights belong to AFP, no matter whether or not they’re topic to copyright underneath Portuguese legislation.’

Additionally at challenge within the case is how AFP treats journalists and photographers who aren’t French. AFP does not acknowledge copyright for non-French journalists and photographers. The SJ has requested the Worldwide Federation of Journalists and the European Federation of Journalists for help, stating that AFP discriminates towards non-French employees. AFP stated, ‘The danger is that journalists in every single place will get burned. We urge our fellow unions to make their members conscious of this case and be ready to defend our financial rights to our journalistic works.’

Leong is just not asking for financial compensation from AFP however needs the rights to his photos. Leong instructed Press Gazette:

‘I’m claiming my copyright as a result of AFP held my photos after [I left] as an alternative of sharing the income with me similar because the French photographers and protecting the cash for themselves… I need justice […] AFP line of protection is so absurd, so egocentric, so short-sighted, that it is onerous to consider.’

Leong has requested Lisbon’s Labor Courtroom to intervene within the court docket case earlier than AFP’s protection is heard. As of now, the listening to has been delayed till October 6.

This case seems to have implications past Leong’s copyright possession. If an EU court docket guidelines in favor of AFP, the consequence may undermine photojournalists’ rights all through Europe. The consequence may additionally hurt the power of photographers and businesses alike to demand compensation for various kinds of information and images. Once more, AFP argues that information or images that report information occasions aren’t inventive and authentic and don’t deserve authorized safety. AFP seems to be arguing each that it owns Leong’s photos and that Leong’s photos do not deserve copyright safety within the first place. These are important claims.


Supply hyperlink

We will be happy to hear your thoughts

Leave a reply

Best Deals Prodcuts
Enable registration in settings - general
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Shopping cart