How about we do the Mac Professional vs M1 Mac mini comparability another time? Truthfully, it appears no quantity of testing will get us a definitive reply. Software program is evolving, extra persons are weighing in with new testing methodologies, and it’s nonetheless enjoyable to see.
On this case, we’re seeing Parker Walbeck from Full Time Filmmaker working in Premiere Professional CC v15.2 – the most recent full launch model. It’s not totally optimized for Apple Silicon simply but, you’d want the most recent beta for that, nevertheless it ought to be a real-world check for video enhancing efficiency utilizing the instruments persons are already utilizing.
This particular check is utilizing a $900 model of the M1 Mac mini, which is simply the bottom mannequin with a reminiscence bump to 16GB RAM. The Mac Professional is much more costly because it is available in at $14,000 and is spec’d as much as the 16-core CPU, 96GB RAM, and the Radeon Professional Vega II with 32GB HBM2 reminiscence. The M1 chip is well-known at this level as an 8-core CPU with 8-core GPU.
Going over the fundamentals, the Mac mini is a tiny machine. It additionally has some limitations with solely two Thunderbolt 3/USB 4 ports, two USB Kind-A ports, HDMI out, headphone out, and Ethernet. The Mac Professional has eight ports of varied varieties, together with USB Kind-C, Thunderbolt, and extra – a good thing about being a full-size pc.
Upfront, Parker is keen to assert the Mac mini is without doubt one of the finest values and is completely able to doing critical video enhancing for some workflows.
Preliminary assessments are merely opening up the Premiere app and a undertaking. The optimizations of the Apple Silicon really had the Mac mini beating the Mac Professional in open time by 12 seconds to 16 seconds.
Subsequent is simply checking playback with quite a lot of codecs. We’re utilizing some DJI 4K footage, some 10-bit 4K XF-AVC from a Canon C70, and a few 8-bit H.264 from an R5. As Parker factors out, generally what’s extra necessary is checking compatibility and optimization fairly than actual specs.
Right here is the place you’ll begin to see the place the Mac Professional’s worth is available in because it has no downside with any of the footage. The Mac mini appeared to have some dropped frames or stuttering with the DJI and C70 clips.
Comparable however simply totally different sufficient is scrubbing. This can be a massive a part of fast enhancing as you’ll need to type by way of your footage as quick as you possibly can. The Mac mini doesn’t deal with this too nicely and isn’t easy. The Mac Professional wasn’t good both, nevertheless it solely actually stumbled with the C70 footage.
Click on response is an attention-grabbing level. Apparently, Parker seen that when making changes it might take a half second to truly apply the command. It may be irritating. The Mac Professional had little to no lag on something.
Render velocity is a vital check. It’s additionally one other level for the Mac Professional because it achieved its aim in simply 4 seconds whereas the Mac mini took 10 seconds. The identical appears to carry for results, as making use of a Warp Stabilizer confirmed the Mac Professional taking 75 seconds versus the Mac mini’s 125 seconds.
Exporting a 1-minute video is about the identical because the Mac Professional did it in 50 seconds and the Mac mini took 125 seconds. This may make an enormous distinction as ready for export may very well be the longest interval of downtime in your edit.
Even with these comparisons, the Mac mini holds up extraordinarily nicely contemplating the value distinction. Professionals will profit from splurging on the Mac Professional, you’ll simply have to resolve whether or not these advantages are value it for you.
A pleasant factor is that if you’d like this energy in one other type issue the M1 chip is used within the MacBook Air, MacBook Professional, and new iMac. Get what works finest for you because the efficiency variations won’t be large.
[source: Parker Walbeck]